Buzz cut after strip scar repair and hair restoration with BHT SFET

Hair Transplant
21

» It seems Gho threatened these doctors with lawyers.

duh

Why would lawyers go after ANY doctors to rectify their statements if their statements were true? why would any doctor rectify his statement if his original statement were true?

why would this doctor say that dr. gho is “indeed able to make two follicles from one follicle” if doctor gho isnt making two follicles from one follicle?

riddle me that

and the answer isn’t, “lawyers made him” lawyers don’t make people do anything they hold people to contracts and truths

for the record though I’m glad to hear doctor Umar’s criticism… I’m interested in hearing a rebuttal from Gho

22

There was a joint declaration against Gho made by several belgian clinics.
IMO, this declaration, or “manifesto” was very loose, very unfocused, attacking Gho carelessly about just everything.

Also, it seems the “leader” of the movement was not a “good leader”, and some doctors didn’t feel comfortable about how things were done. This, and the threat by Gho’s lawyers, probably motivated these 3 doctors to “make peace” with Gho, and forget about the matter.

These rectifying doctors were Feriduni, Boersma, and Verdonschot. You are free to contact them and ask them what kind of proof Gho showed them in order to convince them. Probably it was just the JDT article.

You can also ask them if, as they are convinced now that it works, they will go to learn dr. Gho’s technique (and pay 50k€ for the course).

23

» There was a joint declaration against Gho made by several belgian clinics.
» IMO, this declaration, or “manifesto” was very loose, very unfocused,
» attacking Gho carelessly about just everything.
»
» Also, it seems the “leader” of the movement was not a “good leader”, and
» some doctors didn’t feel comfortable about how things were done. This, and
» the threat by Gho’s lawyers, probably motivated these 3 doctors to “make
» peace” with Gho, and forget about the matter.
»
» These rectifying doctors were Feriduni, Boersma, and Verdonschot. You are
» free to contact them and ask them what kind of proof Gho showed them in
» order to convince them. Probably it was just the JDT article.
»
» You can also ask them if, as they are convinced now that it works, they
» will go to learn dr. Gho’s technique (and pay 50k€ for the course).

they didn’t just “make peace” or rescind their comments… instead they actually FIXED their comments by SAYING that he is actually “making two follicles from one follicle” so your theory seems a little shaky in that respect… not too mention half your theory is built off lots assumptions and your personal opinion

anyway I didn’t ask because I wanted to hear what spanishdudes new excuse/conspiracy theory was for why more gho proof isn’t proof…

I was actually wondering if Dr Umar could tell us why these doctors would correct their statements in such a manner and say gho is “making two follicles from one follicle” if he was not…

24

They FIXED their comments probably because they were forced to fix them.

Don’t you think it is weird that Feriduni and Boersma used the same rectification text, word by word? It looks as if this letter was given to them by Gho’s lawyers, and these doctors simply signed it.

Also, these doctors say that they themselves are guilty, because they should have informed themselves before attacking Gho. Well, AnthonieH, haarweb moderator, tried to contact Gho to ask what kind of proof he showed to these rectifying doctors, but dr. Gho never answered AnthonieH. So it seems that these doctors were guilty of not knowing the “secret proof” that Gho tells you only when you decide to campaign against him???

Who is guilty? Maybe it is Gho who is guilty, for playing a constant “guessing game” with all the balding community.

»
» they didn’t just “make peace” or rescind their comments… instead they
» actually FIXED their comments by SAYING that he is actually “making two
» follicles from one follicle” so your theory seems a little shaky in that
» respect… not too mention half your theory is built off lots assumptions
» and your personal opinion
»
»
»
» anyway I didn’t ask because I wanted to hear what spanishdudes new
» excuse/conspiracy theory was for why more gho proof isn’t proof…
»
» I was actually wondering if Dr Umar could tell us why these doctors would
» correct their statements in such a manner and say gho is “making two
» follicles from one follicle” if he was not…

25

» They FIXED their comments probably because they were forced to fix them.

this is what lawyers do when somebody slanders their client… what is it with you and the conspiracy theories…?

they fixed their MISTAKES because they were MISTAKES and they were FORCED TO FIX THEM because thats what lawyers do when somebody makes “MISTAKES” aka unrightfully slandering the TRUTH

and why would it be weird they all signed the same thing if the supposedly all signed onto the same article to begin with…

somebody teach spanishdude the limitations of lawyers and how they can’t MAKE Dr’s do something like this for NO REASON

no more conspiracy theories lets see what Dr. Umar says if he has a chance this week

26

Yes, the manifesto against Gho was a single document, signed by all doctors.
But Boersma and Feriduni signed separate rectificating documents (same-text).
And Verdonschot wrote a different text, and also signed alone. So it was not a joint rectification.

Lawyers also work for criminals sometimes, you know, and if they are payed by criminals, they will threat good people. It seems that you came from lollypop.land.

And I have told you, these 3 doctors probably saw the JDT article, and considered that this was proof enough.

So I don’t know if they were genuinely convinced, or just scared, or BOTH.

As I have told you: Contact them and ask them, or contact Gho, and ask him what was the “secret proof” that they saw.

You are trying to convince us that this rectification is new proof that Gho works, but if this rectification is based on the JDT article, the rectification wouldn’t add anything new. Agreed or not?

The same as the Reclame Code Commissie. They also ruled in favour on Gho basically because of the JDT article. So as you see, it doesn’t add any new proof. The only basic proof is the JDT article.

And needhairasap, if you are sooooo convinced that Gho works, and all the world is conspiring against Gho, DO IT YOURSELF!!
Oh, I think you have said that you cannot go to Europe in March!!! How come, excuses, excuses, excuses!! Same as Stevie.Dee and Iron_Man. You don’t go to Gho, but stay here day after day, campaigning for Gho, and inundating the forums with “proofs”, like Wesley Sneijder and Joling photos, and a plethora of scientific paperware, that it is nothing but paperware.
If I want to buy a car, I want to see A CAR, not a pile of scientific paperware.

» this is what lawyers do when somebody slanders their client… what is it
» with you and the conspiracy theories…?
»
» they fixed their MISTAKES because they were MISTAKES and they were FORCED
» TO FIX THEM because thats what lawyers do when somebody makes “MISTAKES”
» aka unrightfully slandering the TRUTH
»
»
» and why would it be weird they all signed the same thing if the supposedly
» all signed onto the same article to begin with…
»
»
»
» somebody teach spanishdude the limitations of lawyers and how they can’t
» MAKE Dr’s do something like this for NO REASON
»
»
»
» no more conspiracy theories lets see what Dr. Umar says if he has a chance
» this week

27

» Lawyers also work for criminals sometimes, you know, and if they are payed
» by criminals, they will threat good people.

HOW? ON WHAT GROUNDS? Lawyers can’t just run around like mafia henchmen they need some ground to stand on… is Gho in the mafia now too? making offers they cant refuse?

The GhoFather? lol!

and yes believe it or not I will not be able to fly across the atlantic ocean to europe for a week in march 2012… what is so hard to believe about that? I’m hoping shortly there after I may be able to go but I’m not going to lock myself into an appointment until I know I have time off…

you ask for proof… you get multiple scientific papers… you call conspiracy on them… you ask for more proof… you get 20 videos on ghos site… you ask for more you get Joling and Wesley… you ask for more you get scissorboy… WHEN IS IT ENOUGH? you want a nw1 to nw7 I KNOW… well do the math… if somebody did a procedure EVERY YEAR SINCE 2005 they would have 6,000 grafts total done today… its going to be some time before we see a full restortaion… remember it wasn’t until recently Gho offered more than 600 grafts…

600+600+600+600+1800+1800+1800= 7,800 grafts
(05)+(06)+(07)+(08)+(09) +(10)+ (11) =

now this is the best case scenario… what are the chances somebody spent the money and the time to do this? what are the chances it would work out perfectly over 5 years?

lets just wait for the answer that actually MEANS something to anybody; Dr. Umar’s

28

Your calculation is wrong:
-You assumed only 1 session each 12 months. Why not 2 consecutive days? Or 3?
-Furthermore, I have recently found that since mid 2007, Gho started to do 1200 grafts in 1 day!
That is 2400 grafts in 2 days!

Nick007 17 juli 2007, 19:49
Hi more hair,

The treatment was initially scheduled for two days really, but for about one month they can indeed faster. So I get 1200 grafts in one day. That day, or a few hours longer than originally planned.

Sincerely,
Nick

Mailman 17 juli 2007, 23:05
Right. Hair Science Institute has changed the procedure. They are now trying big sessions in one day to do. This means that the patient is at 7.30 / 8 hours is already expected and only one hour or six in the evening is finished. The patient is then two “teams” so that not all employees treated the whole day to treat. A team to extract a team for the deployment of the grafts. What effect this has on the price I do not know. I suspect not as much as they like as long as your doing.

do the math now:
1200+1200+2400+2800+3200+3600=14400
05----06—07—08—09–10-

» » Lawyers also work for criminals sometimes, you know, and if they are
» payed
» » by criminals, they will threat good people.
»
»
» HOW? ON WHAT GROUNDS? Lawyers can’t just run around like mafia henchmen
» they need some ground to stand on… is Gho in the mafia now too? making
» offers they cant refuse?
»
»
» The GhoFather? lol!
»
»
» and yes believe it or not I will not be able to fly across the atlantic
» ocean to europe for a week in march 2012… what is so hard to believe
» about that? I’m hoping shortly there after I may be able to go but I’m not
» going to lock myself into an appointment until I know I have time off…
»
»
» you ask for proof… you get multiple scientific papers… you call
» conspiracy on them… you ask for more proof… you get 20 videos on ghos
» site… you ask for more you get Joling and Wesley… you ask for more you
» get scissorboy… WHEN IS IT ENOUGH? you want a nw1 to nw7 I KNOW… well
» do the math… if somebody did a procedure EVERY YEAR SINCE 2005 they would
» have 6,000 grafts total done today… its going to be some time before we
» see a full restortaion… remember it wasn’t until recently Gho offered
» more than 600 grafts…
»
» 600+600+600+600+1800+1800+1800= 7,800 grafts
» (05)+(06)+(07)+(08)+(09) +(10)+ (11) =
»
» now this is the best case scenario… what are the chances somebody spent
» the money and the time to do this? what are the chances it would work out
» perfectly over 5 years?
»
» lets just wait for the answer that actually MEANS something to anybody; Dr.
» Umar’s

29

[link=抚州灼中影视文化发展公司 ]Small punch FUE and donor recovery - (2006) cases[/link]

If you review this thread (click above) I posted in 2007, you will see it depicts a patient I transplanted in 2006, during the earlier stages of my FUE technique (SFET). You can see how pristine the donor looks. Smaller size punches (~0.6mm) were used to extract this patient’s grafts, but smaller punches have limitations. A smaller size punch cannot extract an entire follicular unit containing 3 or more follicles if the hairs exit the skin in a dispersed fashion. I cannot extract them because the diameter of the hairs’ exit points exceeds the diameter of the punch. In such a scenario, one is left with 2 options: Leave such FUs alone or extract 1 of 3 or 2 of the 3 hairs in the follicle. In the later scenario, if the follicles left in the donor survive, it may appear that the donor has regenerated, but it hasn’t. You have made 2 follicles out of one follicular unit by dividing it, but the sum total number of hairs remains the same.

Donor area: Primarily because the small sized punch produces smaller wounds, the healing is faster, and scarring even less. Because less hair is moved the donor area appears pristine, but not regenerated, as the “regenerated” follicle is nothing more than a portion of a follicular unit that was not extracted.

Recipient area: As a consequence of the recipient area receiving more singles and doubles than in typical HTs, density tends to be less by comparison. Some patients prefer this, some are okay with it, but it cannot be represented to them that we have multiplied hair. We would have split their follicular units into 2 different surviving follicles, but the number of hairs has not been multiplied.

needhairasap,

There will be no retraction from me. The comments I made and the opinions I offered are based on medical science, as it exists in the year 2011, and the many years I have spent studying and working with skin and hair. If hair multiplication were a reality, it would be easy to provide convincing proof of its success. I feel comfortable in saying a lawsuit will not be filed, because a lawsuit against me would require evidence.

I welcome Dr. Gho’s input on this thread. Since you (needhairasap) are not in a position to provide 1st hand proof either way, going on would raise the question of promoting a clinic blindly.

»
» you wouldn’t be the first doctor to retract your statements… wouldn’t
» even be the sixth to
»
»
»
» http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/21221cb5-4d0b-4684-9cb8-6c1782b057da2010-01-25_Rectificatieverklaring_dr._I._Boersma_totaal[1].pdf
»
»
»
» I just dont get why all these doctors would say gho does if he doesn’t…
»
»
» you should offer HST, I’d make an appointment with you tomorrow

30

Very interesting, Dr. Umar. This is why the only way to verify for donor regrowth, is with before-after haircounts. Its not sufficient that the donor “looks good” or “without gaps”.

For the patient you have posted, the recipient looks quite thin to me for 2900 grafts. This is probably due to 2 factors:
-the grafts are just 1 and 2 hair grafts
-the transection rate is high.

I suspect Gho is using this splitting technique, but I also assume that, after the many years, he has managed to reduce the transection rate to viable levels.
Also, maybe the preservative medium helps him in this regard.

Still, if he is splitting, as we suspect, then oviously: NO HM!!

» [link=抚州灼中影视文化发展公司
» ]Small punch FUE and donor recovery - (2006) cases[/link]

»
»
» If you review this thread (click above) I posted in 2007, you will see it
» depicts a patient I transplanted in 2006, during the earlier stages of my
» FUE technique (SFET). You can see how pristine the donor looks. Smaller
» size punches (~0.6mm) were used to extract this patient’s grafts, but
» smaller punches have limitations. A smaller size punch cannot extract an
» entire follicular unit containing 3 or more follicles if the hairs exit the
» skin in a dispersed fashion. I cannot extract them because the diameter of
» the hairs’ exit points exceeds the diameter of the punch. In such a
» scenario, one is left with 2 options: Leave such FUs alone or extract 1 of
» 3 or 2 of the 3 hairs in the follicle. In the later scenario, if the
» follicles left in the donor survive, it may appear that the donor has
» regenerated, but it hasn’t. You have made 2 follicles out of one follicular
» unit by dividing it, but the sum total number of hairs remains the same.
»
» Donor area: Primarily because the small sized punch produces smaller
» wounds, the healing is faster, and scarring even less. Because less hair is
» moved the donor area appears pristine, but not regenerated, as the
» “regenerated” follicle is nothing more than a portion of a follicular unit
» that was not extracted.
»
» Recipient area: As a consequence of the recipient area receiving more
» singles and doubles than in typical HTs, density tends to be less by
» comparison. Some patients prefer this, some are okay with it, but it
» cannot be represented to them that we have multiplied hair. We would have
» split their follicular units into 2 different surviving follicles, but the
» number of hairs has not been multiplied.
»
»
» needhairasap,
»
» There will be no retraction from me. The comments I made and the opinions
» I offered are based on medical science, as it exists in the year 2011, and
» the many years I have spent studying and working with skin and hair. If
» hair multiplication were a reality, it would be easy to provide convincing
» proof of its success. I feel comfortable in saying a lawsuit will not be
» filed, because a lawsuit against me would require evidence.
»
» I welcome Dr. Gho’s input on this thread. Since you (needhairasap) are
» not in a position to provide 1st hand proof either way, going on would
» raise the question of promoting a clinic blindly.
»
»
»
»
» »
» » you wouldn’t be the first doctor to retract your statements… wouldn’t
» » even be the sixth to
» »
» »
» »
» »
» http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/21221cb5-4d0b-4684-9cb8-6c1782b057da2010-01-25_Rectificatieverklaring_dr._I._Boersma_totaal[1].pdf
» »
» »
» »
» » I just dont get why all these doctors would say gho does if he
» doesn’t…
» »
» »
» » you should offer HST, I’d make an appointment with you tomorrow

31

» [link=抚州灼中影视文化发展公司
» ]Small punch FUE and donor recovery - (2006) cases[/link]
»
»
» If you review this thread (click above) I posted in 2007, you will see it
» depicts a patient I transplanted in 2006, during the earlier stages of my
» FUE technique (SFET). You can see how pristine the donor looks. Smaller
» size punches (~0.6mm) were used to extract this patient’s grafts, but
» smaller punches have limitations. A smaller size punch cannot extract an
» entire follicular unit containing 3 or more follicles if the hairs exit the
» skin in a dispersed fashion. I cannot extract them because the diameter of
» the hairs’ exit points exceeds the diameter of the punch. In such a
» scenario, one is left with 2 options: Leave such FUs alone or extract 1 of
» 3 or 2 of the 3 hairs in the follicle. In the later scenario, if the
» follicles left in the donor survive, it may appear that the donor has
» regenerated, but it hasn’t. You have made 2 follicles out of one follicular
» unit by dividing it, but the sum total number of hairs remains the same.
»
» Donor area: Primarily because the small sized punch produces smaller
» wounds, the healing is faster, and scarring even less. Because less hair is
» moved the donor area appears pristine, but not regenerated, as the
» “regenerated” follicle is nothing more than a portion of a follicular unit
» that was not extracted.
»
» Recipient area: As a consequence of the recipient area receiving more
» singles and doubles than in typical HTs, density tends to be less by
» comparison. Some patients prefer this, some are okay with it, but it
» cannot be represented to them that we have multiplied hair. We would have
» split their follicular units into 2 different surviving follicles, but the
» number of hairs has not been multiplied.
»
»
» needhairasap,
»
» There will be no retraction from me. The comments I made and the opinions
» I offered are based on medical science, as it exists in the year 2011, and
» the many years I have spent studying and working with skin and hair. If
» hair multiplication were a reality, it would be easy to provide convincing
» proof of its success. I feel comfortable in saying a lawsuit will not be
» filed, because a lawsuit against me would require evidence.
»
» I welcome Dr. Gho’s input on this thread. Since you (needhairasap) are
» not in a position to provide 1st hand proof either way, going on would
» raise the question of promoting a clinic blindly.
»
»
»
»
» »
» » you wouldn’t be the first doctor to retract your statements… wouldn’t
» » even be the sixth to
» »
» »
» »
» »
» http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/21221cb5-4d0b-4684-9cb8-6c1782b057da2010-01-25_Rectificatieverklaring_dr._I._Boersma_totaal[1].pdf
» »
» »
» »
» » I just dont get why all these doctors would say gho does if he
» doesn’t…
» »
» »
» » you should offer HST, I’d make an appointment with you tomorrow

Hey dr Umar thank you for your response. This is a far better argument against Gho than any other forum member or doctor has put forth. I contacted HSI and alerted them of the discussion here so we’ll see if Dr Gho or a rep wants to chime in. lol, I know I have no more to add to this conversation don’t worry… and no I’m not a Gho promoter I just like what I’ve seen.

You have to admit if this is what you say it is; a hoax of sorts, than it is a rather elaborate hoax considering he scientific papers and all the other documents BUT it probably wouldnt be the first falsified science paper. again, I’m not a gho promoter or a braindead gho follower so I do thank you for your input on the subject. like I said… the Ghofather may be aware of this thread now so we’ll see what happens

32

Looks like Gho is splitting hairs:-D

» Very interesting, Dr. Umar. This is why the only way to verify for donor
» regrowth, is with before-after haircounts. Its not sufficient that the
» donor “looks good” or “without gaps”.
»
» For the patient you have posted, the recipient looks quite thin to me for
» 2900 grafts. This is probably due to 2 factors:
» -the grafts are just 1 and 2 hair grafts
» -the transection rate is high.
»
» I suspect Gho is using this splitting technique, but I also assume that,
» after the many years, he has managed to reduce the transection rate to
» viable levels.
» Also, maybe the preservative medium helps him in this regard.
»
» Still, if he is splitting, as we suspect, then oviously: NO
» HM!!
»
»
» »
» [link=抚州灼中影视文化发展公司
» » ]Small punch FUE and donor recovery - (2006) cases[/link]
»
»
»
» »
» »
» » If you review this thread (click above) I posted in 2007, you will see
» it
» » depicts a patient I transplanted in 2006, during the earlier stages of
» my
» » FUE technique (SFET). You can see how pristine the donor looks.
» Smaller
» » size punches (~0.6mm) were used to extract this patient’s grafts, but
» » smaller punches have limitations. A smaller size punch cannot extract
» an
» » entire follicular unit containing 3 or more follicles if the hairs exit
» the
» » skin in a dispersed fashion. I cannot extract them because the diameter
» of
» » the hairs’ exit points exceeds the diameter of the punch. In such a
» » scenario, one is left with 2 options: Leave such FUs alone or extract 1
» of
» » 3 or 2 of the 3 hairs in the follicle. In the later scenario, if the
» » follicles left in the donor survive, it may appear that the donor has
» » regenerated, but it hasn’t. You have made 2 follicles out of one
» follicular
» » unit by dividing it, but the sum total number of hairs remains the same.
»
» »
» » Donor area: Primarily because the small sized punch produces smaller
» » wounds, the healing is faster, and scarring even less. Because less hair
» is
» » moved the donor area appears pristine, but not regenerated, as the
» » “regenerated” follicle is nothing more than a portion of a follicular
» unit
» » that was not extracted.
» »
» » Recipient area: As a consequence of the recipient area receiving more
» » singles and doubles than in typical HTs, density tends to be less by
» » comparison. Some patients prefer this, some are okay with it, but it
» » cannot be represented to them that we have multiplied hair. We would
» have
» » split their follicular units into 2 different surviving follicles, but
» the
» » number of hairs has not been multiplied.
» »
» »
» » needhairasap,
» »
» » There will be no retraction from me. The comments I made and the
» opinions
» » I offered are based on medical science, as it exists in the year 2011,
» and
» » the many years I have spent studying and working with skin and hair. If
» » hair multiplication were a reality, it would be easy to provide
» convincing
» » proof of its success. I feel comfortable in saying a lawsuit will not
» be
» » filed, because a lawsuit against me would require evidence.
» »
» » I welcome Dr. Gho’s input on this thread. Since you (needhairasap) are
» » not in a position to provide 1st hand proof either way, going on would
» » raise the question of promoting a clinic blindly.
» »
» »
» »
» »
» » »
» » » you wouldn’t be the first doctor to retract your statements…
» wouldn’t
» » » even be the sixth to
» » »
» » »
» » »
» » »
» »
» http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloads/21221cb5-4d0b-4684-9cb8-6c1782b057da2010-01-25_Rectificatieverklaring_dr._I._Boersma_totaal[1].pdf
» » »
» » »
» » »
» » » I just dont get why all these doctors would say gho does if he
» » doesn’t…
» » »
» » »
» » » you should offer HST, I’d make an appointment with you tomorrow

33

Why do you think I was so stubborn asking Scissorboy and other patients about the petri dishes? You probably thought: baaah, this Spanish Dude only wants to bother them with stupid questions! well, that was oviously not the intention.

» Hey dr Umar thank you for your response. This is a far better argument
» against Gho than any other forum member or doctor has put forth. I
» contacted HSI and alerted them of the discussion here so we’ll see if Dr
» Gho or a rep wants to chime in. lol, I know I have no more to add to this
» conversation don’t worry… and no I’m not a Gho promoter I just like what
» I’ve seen.
»
» You have to admit if this is what you say it is; a hoax of sorts, than it
» is a rather elaborate hoax considering he scientific papers and all the
» other documents BUT it probably wouldnt be the first falsified science
» paper. again, I’m not a gho promoter or a braindead gho follower so I do
» thank you for your input on the subject. like I said… the Ghofather may
» be aware of this thread now so we’ll see what happens

34

» Why do you think I was so stubborn asking Scissorboy and other patients
» about the petri dishes? You probably thought: baaah, this Spanish Dude
» only wants to bother them with stupid questions! well, that was oviously
» not the intention.
»
»

well when you come up with excuse after excuse after excuse after excuse after excuse

your perti dish theory and questions were one of many (ex. faked scientific paper, doctors intimidated by lawyers, etc. etc.) after awhile they all start to take away from each others effectiveness and sound like desperate excuses

anyway, thanks again Dr. Umar, lets see if we can get a response from Dr. Gho… maybe somebody else can send HSI a email alerting them of the thread?

also, Dr Umar said, “I feel comfortable in saying a lawsuit will not be filed, because a lawsuit against me would require evidence.”

IF it is true a lawsuit would require evidence THEN Gho must have evidence (because he has filed lawsuits or at least had comments rescinded )…

35

Wow, another amazing makeover by a truly talented doctor. For someone to have such extensive work done and keep his hair so short. Truly amazing work. No ifs ands or buts.

36

Results are amazing! I myself sport a buzzcut with my FUE procedure, but even a bit shorter than this! I am 29 so am a bit younger :slight_smile:

Bravo Dr. Umar keep the results coming!

» .
»
»
» The question of a buzz cut after transplant is one that crops up often
» during consultation:
»
» .
»
» 1. How short can I cut my hair after strip scar repair by grafting of
» hair?
»
»
» 2. What is the best hair cut following a hybrid hair transplant with head
» and non head hair?
»
»
»
» .
»
» Recently a patient of mine walked in with a buzz cut that speaks to these
» questions. He had 3800 beard hair, 1500 nape and chest and 500 head hair to
» restore his areas of thinning and to camouflage a vexing strip scar.
»
»
» BEFORE
»
»
»
»

May132008004.jpg600×800 68.2 KB

»
»
» .
»
»
»
May132008045.jpg800×600 53.4 KB

»
»
» .
»
»
»
» AFTER.
»
»
»
» To view the result, watch the
» VIDEO
»
» .
»
»
» or copy and paste this link:
» http://www.dermhairclinic.com/patient-videos/strip-scar-repair-using-fue-bht-using-beard-hair-buzz-cut-results/